This test compares the ontology to itself.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination (Lexical similarity) |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
This test compares the ontology to a totally irrelevant one. We ussed the food ontology given in the OWL guide (verbatim).
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights |
Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation |
This test compares the ontology with its generalisation in OWL Lite (i.e., unavailable constraints are replaced by the more general available). The generalization basically removes owl:unionOf and owl:oneOf and the Property types (owl:TransitiveProperty).
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
This test compares the ontology with its restriction in OWL Lite (where unavailable constraints have been discarded).
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
Each label or identifier is replaced by a random one.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights |
Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation |
Each label or identifier is replaced by a random one. Comments (rdfs:comment and dc:description) have been suppressed as well.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights |
Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation |
A random, but consistent, typo generator should be applied to labels and comments.
Not available in this test (if you know how to do it, contact me).
Different naming conventions (Uppercasing, underscore, dash, etc.) are used for labels. Comments have been suppressed.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights |
Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation |
Labels are replaced by synonyms. Comments have been suppressed.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights |
Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation |
The complete ontology is translated to another language than english (French in the current case, but other languages would be fine).
Ontology : [RDF/XML][RDF/XML
in UTF-8] [HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[RDF/XML
in UTF-8] [HTML]
With Equivalent Weights |
Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation |
NOTE: Some parsers do not like ISO-Latin in tags. You are authorized to use the Unicode (UTF-8) version instead (just replace onto.rdf by onto2.rdf).
All subclass assertions to named classes are suppressed.
Ontology : [RD/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
(variation: compile inheritance)
A hierarchy still exists but has been strictly reduced.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
The alignment here contains relations which are not "=" but "<".
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination (No SuperClass weight) |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
Numerous intermediate classes are introduced within the hierarchy.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
All individuals have been suppressed from the ontology.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
All local restrictions on properties have been suppressed from the ontology.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
(variation: no property nor global restrictions on properties)
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
In this test all datatypes are converted to xsd:string.
Not available in this test
(Measurable) values are expressed in different datatypes.
Not available in this test
Properties and relations between objects have been completely suppressed.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
(variation: leave the properties in instances)
Some classes have become instances.
Not available in this test.
Some components of classes are expanded in the class structure (e.g., year, month, day attributes instead of date).
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Here one limitation of the proposed format is that it does not cover alignments such as: journalName = name o journal.
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
Some classes are spreaded over several classes.
Not available in this test.
For a computer scientist, BibTeX is the starting point for a useful bibliographic ontology. It is of wide use and relatively well thought out. This ontology can be found at and is documented in BibTex in OWL.
This is a test of comparing our test ontology with an actual ontology, simpler and closer to the initial BibTeX ontology. The alignment result contains some inclusion (<) alignment relations.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination (Lexical) |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
This ontology is very similar to the previous one, even closer to the genuine BibTeX, with different extensions and naming conventions. It can be found at http://ebiquity.umbc.edu.
The alignment result also contains some inclusion (<) alignment relations.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Reference Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |
This is a test of comparing our test ontology with an actual ontology which contains more items than the actual items used in the current ontology.
The Karlsruhe ontology (http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ontology) is used in the Ontoweb portal. It is a refinement from other ontologies such as (KA)2. As such it does not only defines bibliographic items but many other items.
The alignment contains < as well as > relations.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
This is a test of comparing our test ontology with an actual ontology which is not equivalent but quite close (it can be though of as a previous version).
This INRIA ontology (fr.inrialpes.exmo.rdf.bib.owl) has been designed by Antoine Zimmermann from the BibTeX in OWL ontology and our Bibliographic XML DTD. Its goal was to gather easily a number of RDF items. These items were BibTeX entries found on the web and transformed in RDF according to this ontology.
The actual hierarchy of this ontology contains classes which are subclasses of several other classes.
Ontology : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
Alignment : [RDF/XML]
[HTML]
With Equivalent Weights | With Best Combination |
Alignment | Alignment |
Alignment Evaluation | Alignment Evaluation |